product key do not have just code

According to my opinion, the produced code, it has the defect to exist in version beta. What I mean. I mean to say that second me, beyond to the usual problems, crash, instability, need to rewrite the code, the first problem is the true code, that it is not true. And consequently it does not come accepted. The idea that I have, on such code, it is that he is legabile to the computer in use. That is, as msn it can is remembered on that computer has been installed, and to give problems in connections made from other computers, creed is therefore also the product key. Also because personally I would not succeed to explain this block to me when you insert the code. Beyond to this, my code has worked perfectly. Before the time. The time after, the same code, it does not have any intentional to know is made to accept, to such point that I have one personal theory. And you second to me say if you are acceptable, just, or if, I can comprise it, mistake. According to me, the produced code, it has been based on msn. Creed that, inside of the serveur microsoft, our code is recorded us every, and consequently, when we already insert a put code from someone, being, you allow the phrase me, being on-linens, it does not come accepted. Insomma, in order to render simpler this my speech, every product key it is not other that a ID type msn, that it goes is made to record. And after that it has been recorded, it is like trying to use msn with the name of an other, when this other is connected. it is impossible. At least, I this task, and for me it is the only possible explanation that they are successful to find.

I will try to work with the Babelfish language difference here. What issue are you having with Vista? What error message are you getting? Are you having trouble installing Vista? Are you having trouble using Vista? Are you just trying to comment on your Vista experience?
"DIO BRANDO" wrote in message

According to my opinion, the produced code, it has the defect to exist in version beta. What I mean. I mean to say that second me, beyond to the usual problems, crash, instability, need to rewrite the code, the first problem is the true code, that it is not true. And consequently it does not come accepted. The idea that I have, on such code, it is that he is legabile to the computer in use. That is, as msn it can is remembered on that computer has been installed, and to give problems in connections made from other computers, creed is therefore also the product key. Also because personally I would not succeed to explain this block to me when you insert the code. Beyond to this, my code has worked perfectly. Before the time. The time after, the same code, it does not have any intentional to know is made to accept, to such point that I have one personal theory. And you second to me say if you are acceptable, just, or if, I can comprise it, mistake. According to me, the produced code, it has been based on msn. Creed that, inside of the serveur microsoft, our code is recorded us every, and consequently, when we already insert a put code from someone, being, you allow the phrase me, being on-linens, it does not come accepted. Insomma, in order to render simpler this my speech, every product key it is not other that a ID type msn, that it goes is made to record. And after that it has been recorded, it is like trying to use msn with the name of an other, when this other is connected. it is impossible. At least, I this task, and for me it is the only possible explanation that they are successful to find.

Huh(TM)??
"DIO BRANDO" wrote in message

According to my opinion, the produced code, it has the defect to exist in version beta. What I mean. I mean to say that second me, beyond to the usual problems, crash, instability, need to rewrite the code, the first problem is the true code, that it is not true. And consequently it does not come accepted. The idea that I have, on such code, it is that he is legabile to the computer in use. That is, as msn it can is remembered on that computer has been installed, and to give problems in connections made from other computers, creed is therefore also the product key. Also because personally I would not succeed to explain this block to me when you insert the code. Beyond to this, my code has worked perfectly. Before the time. The time after, the same code, it does not have any intentional to know is made to accept, to such point that I have one personal theory. And you second to me say if you are acceptable, just, or if, I can comprise it, mistake. According to me, the produced code, it has been based on msn. Creed that, inside of the serveur microsoft, our code is recorded us every, and consequently, when we already insert a put code from someone, being, you allow the phrase me, being on-linens, it does not come accepted. Insomma, in order to render simpler this my speech, every product key it is not other that a ID type msn, that it goes is made to record. And after that it has been recorded, it is like trying to use msn with the name of an other, when this other is connected. it is impossible. At least, I this task, and for me it is the only possible explanation that they are successful to find.

It's mechanically translated. Be kind.
"Peter M" wrote in message

Huh(TM)??
"DIO BRANDO" wrote in message According to my opinion, the produced code, it has the defect to exist in version beta. What I mean. I mean to say that second me, beyond to the usual problems, crash, instability, need to rewrite the code, the first problem is the true code, that it is not true. And consequently it does not come accepted. The idea that I have, on such code, it is that he is legabile to the computer in use. That is, as msn it can is remembered on that computer has been installed, and to give problems in connections made from other computers, creed is therefore also the product key. Also because personally I would not succeed to explain this block to me when you insert the code. Beyond to this, my code has worked perfectly. Before the time. The time after, the same code, it does not have any intentional to know is made to accept, to such point that I have one personal theory. And you second to me say if you are acceptable, just, or if, I can comprise it, mistake. According to me, the produced code, it has been based on msn. Creed that, inside of the serveur microsoft, our code is recorded us every, and consequently, when we already insert a put code from someone, being, you allow the phrase me, being on-linens, it does not come accepted. Insomma, in order to render simpler this my speech, every product key it is not other that a ID type msn, that it goes is made to record. And after that it has been recorded, it is like trying to use msn with the name of an other, when this other is connected. it is impossible. At least, I this task, and for me it is the only possible explanation that they are successful to find.

Colin; I am sure you are correct. But the OP may have helped others by including the original along with the translation. I found the translation difficult to read and made little sense. With the original, there would be an increased chance someone understanding of the language could respond.
-- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org
"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message

It's mechanically translated. Be kind.
"Peter M" wrote in message Huh(TM)??

Sure. But he didn't and I'm trying to work with what we have.
"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message

Colin; I am sure you are correct. But the OP may have helped others by including the original along with the translation. I found the translation difficult to read and made little sense. With the original, there would be an increased chance someone understanding of the language could respond.
-- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org
"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message It's mechanically translated. Be kind.
"Peter M" wrote in message Huh(TM)??

I'm not so sure. Mechanical translations don't usually include spelling errors and totally made-up words.
"Colin Barnhorst" wrote:
> It's mechanically translated. Be kind.